Menù Principale
· Links
Benvenuto
Nome di Login:

Password:


Ricordami

[ ]
[ ]
News del 2024
LuMaMeGiVeSaDo
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031 
 
Sondaggio

Questo è un esempio di poll - Ti piace il sito?

SI

NO

Questo sondaggio è riservato agli utenti registrati

Voti: 492
Sondaggi precedenti
Feed RSS
I commenti possono essere distribuite con sistema RSS.
rss1.0
rss2.0
rdf
Seleziona Lingua


1005 i mercati stentano a passare le resistenze

i mercati stentano a passare le resistenze : 8850  19130 2990 sono stati toccati , testati ma ci sono ancora molti tentennamenti e debolezze.
da pochi minuti, per esempio, è partita una gamba ribassista che ha portato il fib sotto 19000 e dax sotto 8800.
il bund sta sui massimi storici a 15117.
Inviato da Antonio Lengua il mer 15 ottobre 2014 - 10:04:47 | Leggi/Invia Commenti:6 |Stampa veloce
Commenti
1005 i mercati stentano a passare le resistenze Pentothal | 15 ott : 10:14
Commenti: 1795

Utente 20 ago : 15:45
Replica a questo
Gran bell'articolo con due scenari sull'AQR sulle banche italiane. In inglese, dall'FT:

Up to a third of the 15 Italian banks undergoing tests could fail
©Reuters
Italy’s investment bankers are agog. In a country still racked by economic weakness and stubborn structural rigidities, dealmakers are already enjoying levels of business on a par with pre-2007 boom times. The activity was sparked by a flurry of privatisations, corporate rationalisations and inward investment from China, the Middle East and beyond.
Now the bankers are looking forward to another macro-driver of mergers and acquisitions. In two weeks’ time the long-awaited results of a vast health check on the eurozone’s banks by the European Central Bank will be made public – and Italy’s lenders are widely expected to fare among the worst.
Some have predicted that up to a third of the 15 Italian banks undergoing a combined asset quality review and stress test could fail, notwithstanding a clutch of pre-emptive capital raising. (Only Germany is expected to do as badly, with many of its 24 lenders in the test drawn from the troubled publicly owned Landesbank sector.)
Test failures will heighten the rationale for takeovers. Italy’s at-risk list is largely made up of popolari, co-operatively owned banks, a number of which are burdened by large bad debts, weak capital levels and tortuous governance that give vast powers to the unions.
Also widely expected to fail is Monte dei Paschi di Siena, Italy’s third largest lender, now chaired by Alessandro Profumo, a veteran dealmaker and former boss of Italian number one, UniCredit.
Basic logic – and Mr Profumo’s heart – might suggest he should orchestrate a mass merger and rationalise Italy’s notoriously overbanked market for good. It would be a fitting career denouement for the 57-year-old who made his name with a series of acquisitions in eastern Europe and Germany when at UniCredit. But there are flaws in such an idea – MPS would be trying to lead a process from a position of weakness; and the popolari’s governance and legal status would hamper combinations beyond their own kith and kin.
Any real-life consolidation looks set to be messier. Bankers reckon two of the largest and strongest co-operatives, UBI and Banca Popolare di Milano, may end up leading separate constellations of popolari. The most likely fate for MPS, meanwhile, could be a takeover by a foreign buyer – if anyone will have them.
As with many Italian banks, prospective acquirers will be wary of the quality of MPS’s loan book – though the ECB exercise should calm nerves on that count. Then there is the macroeconomic outlook for Italy – last week the International Monetary Fund downgraded its forecasts, predicting that gross domestic product will shrink by a further 0.2 per cent this year, rather than grow by 0.3 per cent as previously estimated.
Intesa Sanpaolo and UniCredit, Italy’s ‘big two’, both swear blind they would not touch MPS or the popolari
Tweet this quote
There is also a dearth of potential buyers – Intesa Sanpaolo and UniCredit, Italy’s “big two”, both swear blind they would not touch MPS or the popolari. And the strongest potential foreign bidders are hamstrung – BNP Paribas, which already owns a chunky Italian lender, BNL, is in shock after an $8.9bn fine for sanctions breaches; and Santander has been through a significant change of management.
The severity of the results in the ECB exercise will dictate the pace and manner of what happens to the structure of Italian banks. Some fear an excessively tough outcome could create obvious problems for the Italian government and its energetic prime minister Matteo Renzi. On top of all the other headaches he has to contend with – notably around ongoing labour market reform – he could do without the ECB catalysing a full-blown banking crisis.
But the opposite extreme – the kind of damp squib ECB test result that some now believe is likely – could be worse in the long term for Italy.
With any luck, the process will strike a balance and overcome the challenges of mixing and matching acquirer and acquiree. A more robust “big four”, in place of the current two big banks – buttressed by prospective legal reforms to speed up debt recovery and curtail zombie lending – would aid Mr Renzi’s efforts to engineer an economic turnround.
Cross-border deals would also serve the ECB’s broader purpose of promoting a genuine single market in European financial services, a key longer-term aspiration that is easily forgotten in the fog of war.
Any dealmaking would trigger some investment banker bonuses along the way of course. But even a financially disaffected post-crisis populace might forgive the bankers if the process really helped ease Italy’s current woes.

patrick.jenkins©ft.com


1005 i mercati stentano a passare le resistenze Pentothal | 15 ott : 10:18
Commenti: 1795

Utente 20 ago : 15:45
Replica a questo
Altro articolo molto bello letto ieri sera, conferma la mia opinione che uno dei 3 grandi progetti pan europei sara' rivolto al trasporto di energia.

Pressure points: a worker checks pipelines on the Nord Stream project supplying Russian gas to Germany. EU countries are trying to cut back on volumes from their eastern neighbour
The night shift at Agropolychim, Bulgaria’s biggest fertiliser plant, received a fax at 4.30am on January 6 2009 warning that their gas supply was going to be cut off immediately. The engineers demanded four more hours: an instant shutdown would leave a cocktail of explosive chemicals to congeal in the plant’s pipes, destroying vital equipment. “It was all hands on deck,” recalls Philippe Rombaut, Agropolychim’s chief executive.
Bulgaria was one of the countries hardest hit when Russia cut the gas supply to Europe during that biting winter. Electric heaters sold out within hours. People in many parts of the Balkans had to go back to burning wood. In Sofia, the zoo’s shivering African monkeys were kept alive with buckets of herbal tea mixed with lemon and honey.
Today, Bulgaria is once again seen as extremely vulnerable if political tensions over Ukraine trigger an energy crunch this winter.
Scars from Russia’s gas cuts in 2006 and 2009 run deep across eastern Europe and, at first glance, the continent appears to be in danger again this year thanks to a seemingly unshakeable dependence on Gazprom, Moscow’s gas export monopoly. Europe’s imports from Russia rose 16 per cent last year to hit a record high. Overall, Gazprom supplies 30 per cent of Europe’s gas but, in many eastern states, the reliance is closer to 100 per cent.
Half of Europe’s imports from Russia flow through Ukraine and that supply is always a potential hostage to politics. In June, Gazprom stopped gas sales to Kiev in a pricing dispute, raising fears that Ukraine will be forced to siphon off the EU’s transit gas if supplies are not resumed by winter. Moscow is also tightening the noose around Kiev by preventing EU countries from re-exporting Russian gas as a lifeline to Ukraine in so-called “reverse flows”.
Hopes are rising among diplomats that the EU, Russia and Ukraine will strike an agreement on resuming gas supplies to Kiev in negotiations in Berlin next week. But even if there is a deal, most eastern European governments can hardly relax. “Our baseline scenario is no transit gas through Ukraine,” says Vaclav Bartuska, the Czech government’s energy ambassador.
The EU’s first line of defence lies in far higher gas reserves than those in 2009 and countries have been stockpiling heavily since spring. The stocks are now 93 per cent full, giving most states a cushion of several weeks, or more, if Russia were to cut supplies. Since the previous crisis, Hungary has expanded underground storage facilities to 6.2bn cubic metres to meet annual consumption of 10.2 bcm. They currently hold 4.2 bcm. The Czech Republic has filled its stores with 3.3 bcm, a comfortable margin for a country with annual consumption of 7.5 bcm.
With oil prices sinking beneath $90 a barrel, the EU is increasingly confident that Moscow’s treasury does not want any cut in gas sales nor risk more European customers making a generational shift away from gas to other fuels. “They realise that they would also get into trouble,” says Karel De Gucht, the outgoing EU trade commissioner. “Russia also has an interest that they are seen as a reliable supplier”.
But it may be too late for the Russians to stop the gradual but profound shift away from Gazprom that is under way. Mr Rombaut’s plans at Agropolychim show that Moscow does not hold all the cards. Next year, he will switch from gas to biomass, running on straw and woodchips. That is highly significant for Gazprom because Agropolychim and Neochim, Bulgaria’s leading fertiliser plants, jointly consume about 25 per cent of the country’s gas.
The story is similar in Poland, where Grupa Azoty, the country’s biggest gas consumer, is seeking to break its dependence on Russia. Grupa Azoty, also a fertiliser group, consumes 15 per cent of Poland’s annual gas imports but has vowed that half the 2.3 bcm will come from non-Russian sources by 2016. “I strongly believe that we will be able to get there,” says Pawel Jarczewski, chief executive officer.
Mr Jarczewski’s confidence is partly based on deep structural changes in the EU, loosely referred to as the “energy union”. EU countries are building core infrastructure – such as import terminals for liquefied natural gas and cross-border pipelines – to break the stranglehold of Russian supply routes. However, progress has been agonisingly slow. Fitch, a rating agency, does not expect Europe to lessen its reliance on Russia “for at least the next decade and potentially much longer”.
Major western EU nations are at less risk because they already have greater diversity of supply and big LNG ports, procuring gas from Norway, Algeria and further afield. Germany has the direct Nord Stream pipeline from Russia that is considered unlikely to be caught up in a spat because it does not pass through Ukraine. The western nation viewed as most vulnerable is Italy, which would be in trouble if it suffered simultaneous disruptions from Russia and Libya.
Grupa Azoty is likely to benefit from an LNG terminal at Swinoujscie on Poland’s Baltic coast, due to open next year. The Baltic will also be served by a terminal at Klaipeda in Lithuania, also beginning operations in 2015.
Mr Rombaut says he is shifting for financial reasons, with Russian prices far higher than those at European hubs such as Zeebrugge, where gas is traded on an open market. “I am a businessman . . . this is economics. If I had the same price [for gas] as biomass, I would not go over to biomass,” he says.
Ilian Vassilev, an energy analyst and Bulgaria’s former ambassador to Moscow, says Russia’s high prices are crippling the competitiveness of central European industries such as chemicals, metallurgy and central heating. “Few if any remain afloat,” he says.
In effect, says Mr Vassilev, Gazprom is helping to kill off its own customers, with high prices accelerating deindustrialisation. Bulgaria’s gas imports fell to 2.7 bcm last year from 6.7 bcm in 1989, the last year of communist rule.
He argues that any decision by Russia to cut gas this winter would depend on political factors in Moscow. “President Vladimir Putin’s irrationality has limits and these limits are set by his sense of what is needed to survive and his grip on the oligarchs,” he says.
Russia would be eager to avoid any shock that would push the EU to adopt other fuels, he adds.
“I do not expect that even if gas supplies are interrupted that this will last long – as Moscow is aware that such a move will trigger radical diversification trends in the EU that it will not be able to control,” says Mr Vassilev.
In Prague, Mr Bartuska also warns that Mr Putin could find that there would be no way back: “Fuel switching is not easy, would be costly and would take some time – but once done, many customers would not come back to gas, even if the whole industry begged them on their knees.”


1005 i mercati stentano a passare le resistenze Hurricane | 15 ott : 10:31
Commenti: 974

Utente 07 nov : 19:16
Replica a questo
Che fesso son stato mi son accorto solo ora (grave errore mio) che a 1890 c era il vecchio supportone di minimo di agosto, io aspettavo 1900 come fibonacci e mm200 e ieri si e fermato a 1893 giustamente i supp diventano resistenze, non me ne sono stupidamente accorto.A furia di osservare time frame bassi mi son perso quella res orizzontale importante.

1005 i mercati stentano a passare le resistenze VIABIBITA | 15 ott : 10:47
Commenti: 2357

Utente 11 nov : 14:18
Replica a questo
Sempre a maggioranza gli swing ribassisti

1005 i mercati stentano a passare le resistenze VIABIBITA | 15 ott : 11:18
Commenti: 2357

Utente 11 nov : 14:18
Replica a questo
Puntatina al rialzo col 56

1005 i mercati stentano a passare le resistenze VIABIBITA | 15 ott : 11:39
Commenti: 2357

Utente 11 nov : 14:18
Replica a questo
71 out


Devi essere loggato per inserire commenti su questo sito - Per favore loggati se sei registrato, oppure premi qui per registrarti